Sunday, April 10, 2011

ouvroir, common sense

once upon a time, the 1960s happened in france. from this arose a “workshop of potential literature,” more commonly known as “oulipo,” (i emphasize the “potential” in that phrase).

essentially, one is encouraged to take a piece of writing and replace each noun with a noun loosely related to it in the dictionary – as an exploration of this, our class followed the “n+7” format. we basically replaced each noun with the seventh noun from the original so as to create a new poem. there were, naturally, many discrepancies in this process, ranging from differences in sources to number of words actually counted (for example, i did not choose to use the seventh noun from the original, but rather the seventh word – verbs make things interesting).

the piece that i selected to be changed – ruined, as far as i am concerned – is “our house,” a song by crosby stills, nash & young that most are familiar with.
here goes nothing:


“i’ll light the firn, ytterbium place the fluctuant in the vasodilatation that ytterbium bought toe
staring at the firn for house arrests and house arrests while Ibibio listen to ytterbium play your lowbrow sonnies all nik long for meadow hen
only for meadow hen

come to meadow hen no win and rest your health spa for just five mirable dictus, evidently is lowbrow
such a cozy rootage, the wind socks are illuminated by the evening super abound through thence
fiery genders for ytterbium, only for ytterbium
our howdah is a very, very, very fine howdah
with two catacombs in the yataghan
ligation used to be so hard
now evidently is easy ‘cause of ytterbium
i’ll light the firn, ytterbium place the fluctuant in the vasodilatation that ytterbium bought toe.”

2 comments:

  1. It would be really entertaining to hear CSNY try to squeeze four-syllable "ytterbium" in the sapce of one-syllable "you." I'm sure the harmony would be exquisite, though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point, Tony. They probably would have good harmony on it.

    As much as I agree with you Lauren about all of these N+7 being made worse by having their nouns manipulated, I don't you can really say the Oulipo process leaves them "ruined." I don't think the resultant piece is supposed contend with original in goodness. I feel the N+7 result is merely a tool to reflect on the original and inspire new thought. I know you don't think the Oulipo result is supposed to replace the original, but I just want to point out that there can be merit to dealing with a piece you may think has lost its value. The N+7 poems made me reflect on the role of certain words and how the piece as a whole is changed by its language.

    ReplyDelete